Owner of AIRBNB HOUSE Fined $45,000 for Party Venue Code Violations

Coral Springs Florida, January 29th 2026

A fungus has been spreading in Coral Springs Neighborhoods that goes by the name of Airbnbicus proliferans – which spreads rapidly once zoning immunity is detected.

This has been happening in one particular area , The Hills, located in the prestigious part of old Coral Springs off of Coral Hills Drive and NW 101st Street. Here, sprawling homes of large square footage and 1-4 acres of land, have fallen victim to corporate greed who acquire the property in order to rent it out and make money.

The greed kicks into gear. Instead of renting the homes out to those that are looking for a vacation property to bring their families to, they decide to rent it out as a venue for entertainment including those that need a place to put 100 or so guests for weddings, engagements and birthday parties.

The parking being inadequate, forces the guests to park on the grass, street and other neighbors land. In the Hills, the streets are narrow creatinga hazard for emergency vehicles.

The houses in this area use septic tanks meant to accommodate large families of 8 people. 100 people flushing the toilets fill up the tank quickly and of course overflows – stinking up the neighborhood.

Neighboring homeowners had expected that other families would be moving into the area. After all this is a residential neighborhood with good school zones, and a bike ride away from the City Center of Coral Springs. Residential neighborhoods are for families with kids. The city is supposed to be the premier place where ” You can Work , Live and Raise a Family” . Not the best place to book a wedding.

For years nothing was done about it until the city passed laws limiting the ability for someone to simply walk in and do what they wanted to do with a home.

Finally one such home located at 4080 NW 100th Avenue succumbed to the city ordinance 250160 – which regulates vacation property .

This property. was purchased in 2022 by George McNally and other partners for $1,230,000. He has been renting out this property ever since to the dismay of the neighboring property owners .

Finally the owner of the property did not get away with it. Mr. McNally was fined $45,000 and if additional violations occur he will be prevented from using this property as a Vacation Rental.

The code enforcement department presented 10 violations on this property to the magistrate who is appointed to handle code enforcement violations. They were based on the city code that restricts parked cars to be on the home driveway and not anywhere else. The cars were parked on the grass and on the streets. There where 30-50 cars are parked in the grass and the street, and 50-100 people attending the gathering that was booked there. Only 12 people are allowed to be there.

There presentation was meticulous. They had several police officers who witnessed the violations lined up ready to provide testimony. They had neighbors that complained ready to testify – and they did. Police body cams were presented including video tapes of his customers who were surprised to learn the event they were having was not allowed at this house. One of the customers indicated they even had to pay more money based on the fact that more people attending. The defendant charged them another $600, much to their surprise.

Code Enforcement presented the website image (lotusmansion.com) indicating he was advertising the home as more than a typical Vacation Retal.

At the hearing a video from facebook was shown highlighting the Lotus Mansion venue ( ( that is what he called it ) and boasting that 80 people can attend a wedding event in teh back yard, and more than 120 people can be on the patio.

Here is the video-He basically implicates himself in willingly violating the law :

He also said he had since taken down the video. Code Enforcement pointed out that even though the video was no longer there, he is still doing the illegal use of the premises. The collaborating evidence was no match for the BS he wanted to tell the magistrate.

McNally testimony indicated he was confused about how the law works. He did not have an attorney present. Time after time his testimony proved the charges. He tried to convince the magistrate that all he had to do was show up to the property whenever he was called. ” I was contacted by the police. I rushed to the property. Thank you officers for calling me ” .

The fact that there was a wedding or party with the number of people exceeding the city ordinances and all of the cars parking on the grass and road, was simply set aside by him as he tried to sweet talk the magistrate. He claimed ignorance saying he never new that there were more than the allowed guests.

It was not him it was his guest who broke the rules. ( He did pocket extra money for extra guests as seen above)

Magestrate Hippler, in his ruling, stated that the defendant is getting away with a gift, since the city only asked for a $5000 fine to be imposed on each violation , when they could have gone for the maximum of $15,000. He dismissed only 1 of the infractions due to the police contacting the wrong number when one of the violations occurred.

The defendant has 10 days to pay the fine , and if any further violations of the ordinance occurs, the city can pull his permit away.

Neighbors in the area are concerned that the owner of the venue will not heed the city’s ordinances, since it may be more profitable for him to keep paying the fines then to stop renting out the home as a Commercial Event Venue .

Everyone in the small quite neighborhood pledged to stand watch and call the police in case Mr. McNally rents out the property as a commercial venue – again.

Comments ? Fill out the form and send it us.