Owner of AIRBNB HOUSE Fined $45,000 for Party Venue Code Violations

Coral Springs Florida, January 29th 2026

A fungus has been spreading in Coral Springs Neighborhoods that goes by the name of Airbnbicus proliferans – which spreads rapidly once zoning immunity is detected.

That has been happening in one particular area , The Hills, located in the prestigous part of old Coral Springs off of Coral Hills Drive and NW 101st Street. Here, spralling homes of large sqaure footage and 1-4 acres of land, have fallen victum to corprate greed who acquire the property in order to rent it out and make money.

The greed kicks into gear . instead of renting the homes out to those that are looking for a vacation property to bring their families to, they decide to rent it out as a venue for entertainment including those that need a place to put 100 or so guests for weddings, engagements and bithday parties.

The parking being inadequate, forces the guests to park on the grass, street and other neighbors land. In the Hills, the streets are narrow., creates a hazard for emergency vehicles.

The houses are on spetic tanks that were meant for a marge family of 8 people. 100 people flushing the toilets fill sup the tank quickly and of course overflows – stinking up the neighborhood.

The neighbors of these commerical venues had expected that other families would be moving into the area. After all this is a residential neighborhood with good school zones, and a bike drive away from the City Center of Coral Springs. Residential neighborhoods are for families with kids. the city is supposed to be the premier palce wher eyou can Work , Live and Raise a Family. Not the best place to book a wedding.

For years there was nothing anyone could do about it. It took the city some time to wake up and pass laws limiting the ability for someone to lay down the carnage.

Finally one such home located at 4080 NW 100th Avenue succumbed to the city ordinance 250160 – which regulates vacation property .

This property. was pruchased in 2022 by George McNally and other partners for $1,230,000. He has been renting out this property ever since to the dismay of the property owners next door and on the same street.

This time, the owner of the proerty did not get away with it. Mr. McNally was fined $45,000 and if additional violations occur he will be prevented from using this proerty as a Vacation Renatal.

The city presented to the magistrate 10 violations mostly based city code cars not parked in the driveway, too many people , and using the home as a commercial venue ( he books weddings, engagements, and even birthday parties with clowns. where 30-50 cars are parked in an area that only allows for 50-100 people where you are only allowed 18.

There presentation was meticulous. They had several police officers who witnessed the violations lined up ready to provide testomony. They had neigbors that complained ready to testify – and they did. Police body cams were presented video tapes of his customers who were surprised to learn that the event that they were having was not allowed. One of the customers indicated they even had to pay more money based on the fact that more people attending. The defendant charged them another $600.

They presented the website image (lotusmansion.com)

At the hearing a video on facebook was shown highlighting the Lotus Mansion venue ( ( that is what he called it ) and boasting that 80 people can attend a wedding event in teh back yard, and nore than 120 people can be on the patio.

Here is the video-He basically implicates himself in willingly violating the law.

The collborating evicdence was no match for the BS he wanted to tell the magistrate.

McNally testimony indicated he was confused about how the law works. He did not have an attorney present. Time after time his testimony proved the charges. He thought all that he had to do was show up to the property whenever he was called. The fact that there was a wedding or party with the number of people exceed the city ordinances was simply set aside by him as he tried to sweet talk the magistrate.

It was not him it was his guests.

Hippler, in his ruling, stated that the defendant is getting away with a gift, since the city only asked for a $5000 fine to be imposed on each violation , when they could have gone for the maximum of $15,000. He dismissed only 1 of the infractions due to the police contacting the wrong number when one of the violations occurred.

The defendant has 10 days to pay the fine , and if any further violations of the ordinance occurs, the city can pull his permit away.

Neighbors in the area are concerned that the owner of the venue will not heed the city’s ordinances, since it may be more profitable for him to keep paying the fines then to stop renting out the home as a wedding destination.

Everyone on the neighborhood pledged to stand watch in case Mr. McNally rents out the property as a commercial venue – again.

Comments ? Fill out the form and send it us.